Linked List In-Place Manipulation

Fundamentals

Reversing, reordering, and partitioning pointer chains with O(1) space

71 problems·11 Easy·52 Medium·8 Hard
Pattern Study Guide & Cheat Sheet
▼

Rearrange nodes and pointers in-place by maintaining dummy heads, tracking previous/current/next pointers, and preserving detached segments.

Core Invariant: Pointer Surgery: Always save `temp = curr.next` before overwriting `curr.next`. Use a `dummy` node (`dummy.next = head`) to eliminate edge-case conditionals when mutating the head.

Recognize it (Keywords & Signals)
  • Reverse linked list / reverse nodes in K-groups
  • Merge two or K sorted linked lists
  • Remove N-th node from end of list
  • Reorder list (interleave first half with reversed second half)
  • Partition list around value X
When NOT to use

Random indexed access is required or node count is static and O(N) space is acceptable (convert to list).

How to solve (Step-by-step)
  1. 1.Create `dummy = ListNode(0, head)` and set `prev = None`, `curr = head`.
  2. 2.Before modifying any link: save `next_node = curr.next`.
  3. 3.Reverse or rewire pointer: `curr.next = prev`.
  4. 4.Advance pointers: `prev = curr; curr = next_node`.
  5. 5.Return `dummy.next` or `prev` depending on whether head was replaced.
Watch for (Interview Traps)
  • Overwriting `curr.next` before caching the old next reference
  • Creating circular loops by forgetting to terminate `tail.next = None`
  • Failing on empty list (`head = None`) or single-node lists
Iterative In-Place Linked List Reversal
def reverse_linked_list(head: ListNode | None) -> ListNode | None:
    prev = None
    curr = head
    
    while curr:
        next_temp = curr.next  # 1. Save next reference before breaking link
        curr.next = prev       # 2. Reverse direction of pointer
        prev = curr            # 3. Advance prev forward
        curr = next_temp       # 4. Advance curr forward
        
    return prev  # New head of reversed list
Cost
O(n) single pass · O(1) in-place pointer updates (Zero node allocations; all modifications are in-place.)
Canonical problems
#206 Reverse Linked List: Foundational 3-pointer reversal
#21 Merge Two Sorted Lists: Dummy head + compare node values to splice
#143 Reorder List: Find middle + reverse second half + interleave
#25 Reverse Nodes in k-Group: Count k nodes, reverse segment, reconnect recursively
Medium·134 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 47.6%
GithubspinnyAirwallex+131
Hard·57 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 60.0%
NetskopeCohesityX+54
Medium·42 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 48.8%
Ola CabsEarnInOla Cabs+39
Easy·41 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 68.5%
HPENeetCode 150NeetCode 150+38
Easy·40 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 80.8%
YahooZyngaLuxoft+37
Hard·36 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 49.7%
DevRevNetskopeCoupang+33
Hard·30 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 66.6%
BuyHatkeQualcommCadence+27
Easy·28 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 54.7%
YahooNeetCode 150NeetCode 150+25
Medium·25 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 63.3%
MobileyeCVENTCadence+22
Medium·22 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 52.0%
BroadcomSymantecNeetCode 150+19
Medium·22 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 55.0%
OptiverCloudflareSplunk+19
Medium·19 companies·Max freq 89%·Acc 65.7%
NeetCode 150NeetCode 150Blind 75+16
Easy·18 companies·Max freq 93%·Acc 0.6%
IXLAMDIntel+15
Medium·17 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 45.1%
XXNeetCode 150+14
Medium·16 companies·Max freq 89%·Acc 51.9%
RevolutArista NetworksNutanix+13
Medium·16 companies·Max freq 69%·Acc 69.8%
AltimetrikArista NetworksBloomberg+13
Medium·14 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 58.7%
DeliverooDocusignX+11
Medium·14 companies·Max freq 79%·Acc 58.5%
PaytmVMwareAmerican Express+11
Hard·13 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 44.4%
NextdoorAtlassianLinkedIn+10
Easy·13 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 66.7%
TripActionsCouchbasePalo Alto Networks+10
Medium·13 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 78.4%
ChimeRoktBloomberg+10
Easy·13 companies·Max freq 88%·Acc 82.1%
Walmart LabsAMDAccenture+10
Easy·13 companies·Max freq 75%·Acc 64.2%
AirbnbWells FargoSamsung+10
Hard·12 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 0.5%
Liberty MutualDropboxSquarepoint Capital+9
Medium·12 companies·Max freq 67%·Acc 62.6%
MeeshoJosh TechnologyAmazon+9
Medium·11 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 83.1%
SambaNovaSquarepoint CapitalArista Networks+8
Hard·11 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 46.0%
LinkedInWoven by ToyotaRoku+8
Medium·11 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 52.1%
BlackBuckArista NetworksBloomberg+8
Medium·11 companies·Max freq 88%·Acc 84.1%
Texas InstrumentsAdobeOla Cabs+8
Medium·10 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 42.9%
AirwallexJosh TechnologyNvidia+7
Medium·10 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 0.7%
ZenefitsLyftSalesforce+7
Easy·10 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 82.4%
NutanixRobloxMathWorks+7
Hard·9 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 59.8%
OptiverXX+6
Easy·9 companies·Max freq 75%·Acc 54.9%
Arista NetworksBloombergAmazon+6
Medium·9 companies·Max freq 53%·Acc 67.4%
Walmart LabsBloombergMicrosoft+6
Medium·9 companies·Max freq 51%·Acc 64.8%
LyftByteDanceAmazon+6
Medium·9 companies·Max freq 50%·Acc 62.8%
BloombergMicrosoftPinterest+6
Medium·8 companies·Max freq 88%·Acc 64.7%
JTGJosh TechnologyZopsmart+5
Medium·7 companies·Max freq 79%·Acc 63.1%
BloombergAdobeAmazon+4
Medium·7 companies·Max freq 50%·Acc 57.8%
BloombergMetaMicrosoft+4
Medium·7 companies·Max freq 38%·Acc 60.9%
tcsGoogleGoldman Sachs+4
Medium·6 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 69.5%
Info EdgeMicrosoftAmazon+3
Medium·6 companies·Max freq 76%·Acc 83.3%
Josh TechnologyAmazonGoogle+3
Medium·6 companies·Max freq 59%·Acc 53.2%
ByteDancePalo Alto NetworksUber+3
Medium·6 companies·Max freq 38%·Acc 69.6%
AmazonOracleGoogle+3
Medium·6 companies·Max freq 31%·Acc 30.5%
MicrosoftGoogleApple+3
Medium·5 companies·Max freq 100%·Acc 52.0%
SoundHoundMetaGoogle+2
Medium·5 companies·Max freq 63%·Acc 89.7%
Josh TechnologyMicrosoftOracle+2
Medium·5 companies·Max freq 58%·Acc 0.6%
QualcommMicrosoftBloomberg+2
Medium·5 companies·Max freq 50%·Acc 64.8%
SnowflakeGoldman SachsGoogle+2
50 displayed (of 50 matching)Filtered: All Companies

Top Companies Testing Linked List In-Place Manipulation

Browse company-specific interview problem lists and recency breakdowns:

Explore All 22 DSA Coding Patterns

Master core algorithmic patterns tested in FAANG & Big Tech coding interviews.

Patterns Hub

Linked List In-Place Manipulation frequently asked questions

What is the Linked List In-Place Manipulation pattern in coding interviews?

Reversing, reordering, and partitioning pointer chains with O(1) space It is categorized under Fundamentals and features 71 curated interview problems across Easy (11), Medium (52), and Hard (8) difficulties.

Which tech companies frequently test Linked List In-Place Manipulation?

Companies frequently asking Linked List In-Place Manipulation questions include Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Meta, Bloomberg, Oracle.

How do I master the Linked List In-Place Manipulation pattern?

Start by studying the algorithmic strategy and template code, then practice Easy and Medium problems before attempting Hard problems under timed conditions.